Negotiating Legal Pluralism: Customary Nobat Marriage and Islamic Law in Bayan, North Lombok

  • Zarkawi Zarkawi Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
Keywords: Legal pluralism, Customary law, Islamic marriage, Sasak, Multicultural governance

Abstract

This article analyzes the nobat (a Bayan customary marriage institution) marriage tradition practiced by the Sasak indigenous community in Andalan Village, Bayan (North Lombok), as a concrete site where customary norms, Islamic jurisprudence, and state regulation are continuously aligned to produce marital legitimacy. Using a qualitative socio-legal design, fieldwork in 2025 combined semi-structured interviews with five key actors (village authorities, a customary–religious leader, and recently married couples), direct observation of ritual stages, and review of relevant statutory and regional regulations. The findings show that nobat operates as a customary legal institution: it institutionalizes deliberation, deploys sajikrama (customary fine/compensation) as a restorative economic sanction, allows negotiated arrangements of guardianship when needed, and links communal validation to religious contracting and administrative registration in a sequential order. Rather than reflecting simple harmony between culture and religion, nobat illustrates dialogical legal pluralism in which authority and legality are co-produced through communal negotiation across overlapping normative orders. The study contributes to multicultural legal studies by demonstrating how indigenous institutions remain active agents in governing diversity and constructing justice within Indonesia’s layered legal landscape.

References

Anggoro, S. A., & Negara, T. A. S. (2021). The struggle for recognition: Adat law trajectories under Indonesian politics of legal unification. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 29(1), 33–62. https://brill.com/view/journals/ijgr/29/1/article-p33_33.xml

Bedner, A., & Van Huis, S. (2010). Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism. Utrecht Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.130

Bowen, J. (2021). Snouck Hurgronje, Shari a, and the Anthropology of Islam. The History of Oriental Studies, 312.

Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, law, and equality in Indonesia: An anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic Analysis. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 7187–7193). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3470

Breger, R., & Hill, R. (2021). Cross-cultural marriage: Identity and choice. Routledge.

Budiwanti, E. (2000). Islam Sasak Adat Versus Time Lima. LkiS.

Button, K., Moore, E., & Himonga, C. (2016). South Africa’s system of dispute resolution forums: The role of the family and the state in customary marriage dissolution. Journal of Southern African Studies, 42(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2016.1148390

Cammack, P. (2007). Political Development in the Third World: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.

Chua, L. J. (2014). Charting socio-legal scholarship on Southeast Asia: Key themes and future directions. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 9, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000910

Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., & McConnachie, K. (2019). Socio-legal theory and methods. In Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods (pp. 3–8). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429952814-1

Griek, I. (2014). Human rights in translation: Dispute resolution in the Bhutanese refugee camps in Nepal [Tilburg University]. https://repository.tilburguniversity.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/3079f950-72d4-4b70-b447-e92232b8c05c/content

Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387

Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal Pluralism: Concept, Theoretical Dialectics, and Its Existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566

Isra, S., Ferdi, F., & Tegnan, H. (2025). Rule of Law and Human Rights Challenges in South East Asia: A Case Study of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1081

Koenig, M. (2007). Europeanising the governance of religious diversity: An institutionalist account of Muslim struggles for public recognition. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830701432756

Kohn, L. S. (2025). Justice Delayed by Design: The Harms of Our Protracted Divorce System. Vill. L. Rev., 70, 169. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/vllalr70&section=7

Lukito, R. (2012). Legal pluralism in Indonesia: Bridging the unbridgeable. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203113134

Macdonald, T. (2023). Political justice in a complex global order: rethinking pluralist legitimacy. International Affairs, 99(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac291

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638

Nashih, M. M. (2025). Sociological Analysis of Islamic Law on the Relationship between Adat Law, Ethics, and Human Rights in the Context of Modern Indonesia. Law and Judicial Review, 1(2), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.70764/gdpu-ljr.2025.1(2)-08

Nasir, M. A. (2020). Religion, Law, and Identity: Contending Authorities on Interfaith Marriage in Lombok, Indonesia. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 31(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2020.1773618

Salim, A. (2015). Contemporary Islamic law in Indonesia: Sharia and legal pluralism. Edinburgh University Press.

Suhardi, M. (2025). Legal Pluralism and Cultural Legitimacy: Reframing Sasak Customary Law to Prevent Child Marriage in Lombok. Society, 13(1), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.818

Sukarni, S., Nurhayati, D., & Hasan, A. (2024). The Role of Local Culture in Shaping Social Justice Practices in Multicultural Societies. Journal Social Humanity Perspective, 2(3), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.71435/639165

Swenson, G. (2018). Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice. International Studies Review, 20(3), 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix060

Taqwa, L. (2016). Local wisdom in the management of forests in North Lombok Bayan indigenous people. International Conference on Ethics in Governance (ICONEG 2016), 374–377. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconeg-16.2017.83

von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2002). Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 34(47), 37–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2002.10756563

Von Haldenwang, C. (2016). Measuring legitimacy: new trends, old shortcomings? (Issue 18/2016). Discussion Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/199481

Waruwu, R. L. (2021). The Implementation of Religion Ministry Regulation Number 19 in 2018 Article 3 about marriage registration in Religious Affairs Office of North Padangsidimpuan [IAIN Padangsidimpuan]. http://etd.uinsyahada.ac.id/7015/

Yarbrough, M. W. (2015). Toward a political sociology of conjugal-recognition regimes: Gendered multiculturalism in South African marriage law. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(3), 456–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv016

Yasin, M. N. (2008). Hukum Perkawinan islam sasak. UIN-Maliki Press.

Yeganehfar, E., & Shahsavari, P. (2023). The intersection of cultural norms and human rights law: A qualitative analysis of marriage practices. Journal of Historical Research, Law and Policy, 1(2), 9–17.

Yuliatin, Y., Haslan, M. M., & Sawaludin, S. (2023). Customary law as the basis of character education (study on indigenous peoples in bayan village, north lombok). Journal of Nonformal Education, 9(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v9i1.42720

Published
2025-12-31
Section
Articles