Navigating Pluralism in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis of Mut'ah Marriage in Ja'fari and Sunni Schools of Thought
Abstract
This study examines the differing views on mut'ah (temporary) marriage between the Ja'fari and Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence through a comparative analysis of their legal reasoning methodologies. Employing qualitative research methods including textual analysis of primary sources, historical examination, and comparative legal analysis, the study explores the origins of these divergent interpretations and their implications for contemporary Muslim societies. The findings reveal that differences in scriptural interpretation, hadith authentication, and legal principles contribute to the contrasting positions on mut'ah marriage. While the Ja'fari school considers it permissible based on Quranic verses and certain hadith, Sunni schools generally prohibit it, citing abrogation and potential social harms. The study highlights how these differing views reflect broader patterns of legal pluralism in Islamic jurisprudence and impact contemporary debates on gender, marriage, and religious authority in Muslim communities. By critically evaluating arguments from both traditions, this research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of Islamic legal diversity and its ongoing negotiation in modern contexts.
References
Abou-El-Fadl, R. (2015). Between Cairo and Washington: Sectarianism and counter-revolution in post-Mubarak Egypt. In Revolutionary Egypt (pp. 227–253). Routledge.
Abou El Fadl, K. (2014). Reasoning with god: Reclaiming Shari’ah in the modern age. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ahmad, R. S. (2014). Religion and the state in Turkey and Iran: a comparative overview. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 7(1), 36–53.
Ahmady, K. (2020). A House on Water: A Comprehensive Study on Sigheh Mahramiat and Temporary Marriage in Iran. Avaye Buf.
Akhtar, R. C. (2018). Modern traditions in Muslim marriage practices, exploring English narratives. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 7(3), 427–454.
Al-‘Asqalanī, S. al-D. A. al-F. A. ibn ‘Alī ibn Ḥajar. (n.d.). Tahdhib Al-Tahdhib.
Al-Hajjaj. (n.d.). Shahih Muslim (Jilid 2). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
al-Kifaee, F. R. A. (2010). The role of the Hawza of Najaf and Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani in restructuring the Iraqi governance system in post-Baathist Iraq.
Al-Qur’an, P. (1971). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya. Yayasan Penyelenggara Penerjemahan Tafsir Al-Qur’an.
Alalwani, T. J., Al-Shikh-Ali, A. S., & DeLorenzo, Y. T. (2003). Source methodology in Islamic jurisprudence. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
Ali, M. (2016). Hukum Nikah Mut’ah dan Hubungannya dengan Pembentukan Keluarga Sakinah (Studi Keluarga Sakinah Model Kementerian Agama). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 3(1).
Amal, M. K. (2020). Towards a deliberative conflict resolution? A reflection on state inclusive response to Sunni-Shi’a tension in Indonesia’s democracy’. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 8(2), 226–256.
Amin, H. (2014). Making Sense Of Islamic Social Movements: A Critical Review Of Major Theoretical Approaches. Pakistan Historical Society. Journal of the Pakistan Historical Society, 62(2), 33–56.
Anjum, R., Mir, K. H., & others. (2020). Contextualizing Religious Pluralism: An Islamic Perspective. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 2(4), 181–188.
Arifin, M. R. (2020). Tinjauan Hukum Islam terhadap Implikasi Fenomena Kawin Kontrak dalam Kehidupan Sosial, Ekonomi Masyarakat Desa. Khazanah Hukum, 1(1).
Asghari, S. (2023). Understanding Human Dignity in Shi’i Islam: Debates, Challenges, and Solutions for Contemporary Issues. Religions, 14(4), 505.
Atabik, A. (2015). MELACAK HISTORITAS SYI’AH (Asal Usul, Perkembangan Dan AliranAlirannya). FIKRAH: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 3(2), 183.
Azzouz, F. (2022). Muslim Marriage and Divorce Practices in Britain: Avenues for Regulation. University of Bristol.
Bakar, M. H. A., & Abdghani, A. H. (2011). Towards achieving the quality of life in the management of zakat distribution to the rightful recipients (the poor and needy). International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4).
Black, E. A., Esmaeili, H., & Hosen, N. (2013). Modern perspectives on Islamic law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Böttcher, A. (2002). Sunni and Shi’i Networking in the Middle East. Mediterranean Politics, 7(3), 42–63.
Dewi, L. (2020). Law Protection for Post Divorced Women Through Law Enforcement with a Gender Perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.200513.031
Duderija, A. (2014). Shari’Ah Law and Women in Islam. Controversies in Contemporary Religion, Praeger Ed. Paul Hedges.
Duderija, A. (2020). Contemporary Muslim male reformist thought and gender equality affirmative interpretations of Islam. Feminist Theology, 28(2), 161–181.
Elgvin, O. (2023). For the Greater Good: Common Goals and Institutional Sunni--Shi a Cooperation in Norway. Journal of Muslims in Europe, 12(1), 15–35.
Enayat, H., & Enayat, H. (1982). Shi’ism and Sunnism: conflict and concord. Modern Islamic Political Thought: The Response of the Shi’i and Sunni Muslims to the Twentieth Century, 18–51.
Fauzi, M. L. (2021). Aligning religious law and state law: street-level bureaucrats and Muslim marriage practices in Pasuruan, Indonesia. Dissertation, Leiden University, 2021. https://www. universiteitleiden..
Faza, A. M. (2015). Syi’ah dalam Kitab Sunni. Perdana Publishing.
Gourij, A. and Q. (1991). Temporary Marriage (Mutʿah ) in Islamic Law.
Hakim, F. N. R. (2021). Re-understanding Tolerance through Intrareligious Dialogue: the Discourse of Anti-Shi’ism in Indonesia. Ulumuna, 25(2), 350–372.
Hamoudi, H. A. (2017). Arguing Islam after the Revival of Arab Politics. By Nathan J. Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Pp. 296. $29.95 (cloth). ISBN: 9780190619428. Journal of Law and Religion, 32(3), 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2017.40
Hamzah, E. (2020). Religious Pluralism (Perspective of Islamic Normativity and History). Journal of Islam and Science, 7(2), 110–115.
Hanum, Y. N., Rosyidah, A., & others. (2024). Mut’ah Marriage: Perspectives Across Religious Groups. NIZAM: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(1), 1–10.
Hasannia, A., & Masoudian, M. (2021). Temporary Marriage Among Shiite and Sunni Muslims: Comparative Study of "Istimta, Mut’ah, and Misyar. Temporary and Child Marriages in Iran and Afghanistan: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Issues, 31–45.
Helandri, J., Achmad, G., & Supriadi, S. (2023). Mut’ah Marriage in Islamic Perspective. Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies, 1(1), 38–47.
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.
Hollstein, B. (2011). Qualitative approaches. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 404–416.
Huis, S. C. van. (2015). Islamic courts and women’s divorce rights in Indonesia: The cases of Cianjur and Bulukumba. Universiteit Leiden.
Imam, M. A., Ahmad, S., Bhatti, M. A. A., & Afzal, M. (2023). Contextualizing Research Approaches: The Role of Western and Islamic Philosophies in Shaping Methodology and Knowledge Creation. Al-Irfan, 8(16), 69–90.
Ismail, M. (2015). BUILDING UNDERSTANDING DIVERSITY RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE IN POST-CONFLICT BETWEEN AHMADIYYA AND THE MAJORITY SUNNI GROUP IN EAST JAVA. Demcracy and Accountability (ICoDA), 213.
Jiwa, S. (2015). Governance and Pluralism under the Fatimids (909--996 CE). The Shi ’i World: Pathways in Tradition and Modernity, 111–130.
Kamali, M. H. (2009). Diversity and pluralism: A Qur’anic perspective. ICR Journal, 1(1).
Kamali, M. H. (2015). Extremism, Terrorism and Islam: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Islam & Civilisational Renewal, 6(2), 148–165.
Kayane, Y. (2020). Understanding Sunni-Shi’a sectarianism in contemporary Indonesia: A different voice from Nahdlatul Ulama under pluralist leadership. Indonesia and the Malay World, 48(140), 78–96.
Kayaoglu, T. (2015). Explaining interfaith dialogue in the Muslim world. Politics and Religion, 8(2), 236–262.
Krause, D., Svensson, I., & Larsson, G. (2019). Why Is There So Little Shia--Sunni Dialogue? Understanding the Deficit of Intra-Muslim Dialogue and Interreligious Peacemaking. Religions, 10(10), 567.
Leckey, R. (2017). Review of comparative law. Social & Legal Studies, 26(1), 3–24.
Lubis, A. A. A. M. R., Muzakki, M. H., Rizal, F., & Rodli, A. (2021). Mut’ah Marriage: Between Human Rights and Maqashid Shari’ah. ICIS 2020: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Islamic Studies, ICIS 2020, 27-28 October 2020, Ponorogo, Indonesia, 237.
Lufaefi. (2019). HARMONISME FIKIH JA’FARI DAN HANAFI: Kajian Historis Dan Sumber-Sumber Hukum Keduanya. Al-Afkar, Journal for Islamic Studies, 2(1), 241.
Mahmood, M., Ullah, I., Hassan, M., & others. (2024). Political Dynamics in Islam: Addressing Contemporary Challenges. GUMAN, 7(1), 272–281.
Makmun, A. R. (2021). Mut’ah Marriage: Between Human Rights and Maqashid.
Malam, B. (2021). The Political Model of the Prophet Muhammad and His Rightly Guided Caliphs: An Overview. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(2), 251–259.
May, A. (2012). Kontroversi Status Hukum Nikah Mut‟ah (Analisis Terhadap Pendapat Para Ulama). Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 46(2), 182–183.
Mello, P. A. (2022). Qualitative Comparative Analysis. In P. A. Mello & F. Ostermann (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis Methods. Routledge.
Motahari, yatollah M. (2012). Jurisprudence And Its Principles. Tahrike Tarsile Qur’an.
Motzki, H. (2002). The origins of Islamic jurisprudence: Meccan fiqh before the classical schools.
Mughniyah, M. J. (n.d.). Al-Syi’ah Fi Al-Mizan.
Muhajir, M., & Kamil, M. F. (2020). The Views of Contemporer Mut’ah Marriage among Yogyakarta Shi’ite Leaders. Dialog, 44(2).
Muhtada, D. (n.d.). Ja’far Al-Ṣādiq Dan Paradigma Hukum Mazhab Ja’fari.
Muhtada, D. (2015). Ja’far Al-Ṣādiq Dan Paradigma Hukum Mazhab Ja’fari. Al-Ahkam, 25(1), 69.
Muslimin, J. M. (2005). Islamic law and social change: a comparative study of the institutionalization and codification of Islamic family law in the nation-states Egypt and Indonesia (1950-1995). Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky.
Mutahhari, A. M. (2010). A Survey into the Lives of the Infallible Imams. ABWA Publishing and Printing Center. http://ijtihadnet.com/wp-content/uploads/A-Survey-into-the-Lives-of-the-Infallible-Imams.pdf
Nasar, A.-Q. dan M. H. (n.d.). Sunan Ibnu Majah (Jilid 2). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
Niedermeier, A. (2020). Review of Powell, Emilia (2020): Islamic Law and International Law: Peaceful Resolution of Disputes, Oxford and others, Oxford University Press. Review of Economics and Political Science, 5(4), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-08-2020-0128
Nisa, E. F. (2021). 5 Mutʿa Marriage among Youth in the Non-Shiʿi Environment of Indonesia. In Global Dynamics of Shi’a Marriages (pp. 103–120). Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.36019/9781978818507-007
Nukhba, G. M. (2023). Exploring the Analytical Approach in Analyzing Prophetic Hadith: Methodologies and Insights from Hadith Critics. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 3(4), 29–37.
Nursihah, A. (2016). Nikah Mut’ah Perspektif Shi’ah. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 15(2), 136.
Parani, R., Verga, D. H., & Purba, H. (2024). The dynamics of transactional communication in contract marriages within Cipanas community. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 8(2), 363–372.
Parray, T. A. (2012). The legal methodology of “fiqh al-aqalliyyat” and its critics: An analytical study. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 32(1), 88–107.
Rahman, M. T., & Setia, P. (2021). Pluralism in the Light of Islam. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 1(2), 204–210.
Rais, I. (2014). aktek Kawin Mut‟ah di Indonesia dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Jurnal Ahkam, 14(1), 104.
Rakhmat, J. (2007). Dahulukan Akhlak Di Atas Fiqih. Mizan.
Rodin, D. (2013). Khumus Dalam Perspektif Mazhab Jafari. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 4(2), 124.
Rokhmad, A., & Susilo, S. (2017). Conceptualizing authority of the legalization of Indonesian women’s rights in Islamic family law. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 11(2), 489–508.
Rouf, A. (n.d.). Kriteria Hukum Fikih Ja‘Fari.
Rouf, A. (2017). Kriteria Hukum Fikih Ja‘Fari. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 17(1), 119.
Sachedina, A. (2004). Muslim Intellectuals and the Struggle for Democracy. Global Dialogue, 6.
Shihab, Q. (2005). Perempuan. Lentera hati.
Subhan. (2018). Dialektika Sunni Dan Syiah Melacak Argumentasi Hukum Nikah Mut’ah. ATTURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(1), 3.
Sulihkhodin, M. A., Asadurrohman, M., & Wibowo, A. (2023). The Reality of Mut’ah Marriage in Indonesia: Reinterpretation of the Opinion of Shia Scholars. TAJDID, 29(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.36667/tajdid.v29i2.710
Suryani, I. (2023). Juridical Study of Islamic Law Against Marriage Under the Hand Through Online Applications. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(3), 357–367.
Syarifuddin, A. (2006). Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Weiss, B. (1978). Interpretation Inlslamic Law: The Theory of Ijtihad. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 26(2), 199–212.
Yusuf, N., & Azizah, N. (2021). Hak Nafkah Iddah dan Mut’ah Pasca Cerai di Mahkamah Syariah Banda Aceh dan Pengadilan Agama Medan.
Zahraa, M. (2003). Unique Islamic law methodology and the validity of modern legal and social science research methods for Islamic research. Arab LQ, 18, 215.
Zahro, M. A. (1996). Tārīkh Al-Madhāhib Al-Islāmiyyah. Dar al-Fikr al-’Arabiy.
Zuhriyah, L., & Muna, N. (2023). Economic Ability as a Kafa’ah Principle and the Recognition of Difabel Marriage Guardian in As-Sila fi Bayani An-Nika by Khalil Al-Bangkalany. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 16(1), 89–111.
Copyright (c) 2024 Doni Azhari, Asmuni Asmuni, Khoiruddin Nasution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
