Legal Protection of Minority Groups within Patriarchal Structures: The Rights of Women and Children Post-Divorce

Firmansyah Pratama Alim; Emma Maripah; Abdul Fajri Kolopita

doi:10.30984/kijms.v6i1.1336

Firmansyah Pratama Alim Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu, Indonesia
Emma Maripah Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu, Indonesia
Abdul Fajri Kolopita King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30984/kijms.v6i1.1336

Keywords: Minority rights, Intersectionality, Patriarchal structure, Family legal protection, Muslim divorce

Abstract

Divorce produces significant impacts on women and children as minority groups within patriarchal structures, particularly within Indonesia's plural legal system that integrates Islamic law, national law, and social practices. This research aims to analyze legal protection mechanisms for women and children as minority groups post-divorce in the Muslim community of Manado City, identify structural patriarchal factors that hinder the fulfillment of rights, analyze the intersectionality of oppression within the plural legal system, and evaluate the effectiveness of existing protection mechanisms. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, this empirical juridical research integrates a framework for minority studies and structural patriarchal analysis. Primary data were obtained from 106 talaq divorce cases at Manado Religious Court in 2021, focusing on 15 reconvention cases and 46 complaint cases at the UPTD for Women and Child Protection. Data collection through document study, observation, and in-depth interviews was analyzed using thematic analysis. As many as 85.8% of cases were decided in absentia without the wife's presence, reflecting systemic marginalization. Hindering factors include limited legal knowledge, economic dependency, masculinity construction that avoids responsibility, and institutional monitoring vacuums. The reconvention mechanism shows 66.7% success, but is limited by unequal accessibility. Legal protection for women and children requires systemic transformation, integrating minority rights perspectives through strengthening integrated databases, rights-based legal aid, Family Court Monitoring Units, and intersectionality-based capacity building for law enforcement.

References

Ahmad, N., Zamri, Z. H., & Omarali, N. S. (2024). Islamic Nations’ Approaches to Combating Gender Discrimination against Women: An Examination of the Southeast Asia Region. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 16(2), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v16i2.29965

Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bröckel, M., & Andreß, H.-J. (2015). The economic consequences of divorce in germany: What has changed since the turn of the millennium? Comparative Population Studies, 40(3), 277 – 312. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2015-04en

Collins, P. H. (2022). Black Feminist Thought, 30th Anniversary Edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003245650

Connell, R. W. (2020). Masculinities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116479

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Crenshaw, K. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The Public Nature of Private Violence: Women and the Discovery of Abuse (pp. 93–118). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Das, C. (2016). British-Indian Adult Children of Divorce. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315570365

De Vaus, D., Gray, M., Qu, L., & Stanton, D. (2017). The economic consequences of divorce in six OECD countries. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 52(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.13

Elver, H. (2012). Secular Constitutionalism and Muslim Women’s Rights. In Feminist Constitutionalism (pp. 413–432). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980442.030

Furstova, J., Malinakova, K., Sigmundova, D., & Tavel, P. (2021). Czech Out the Atheists: A Representative Study of Religiosity in the Czech Republic. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 31(4), 288 – 306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1844967

Henrard, K., & Dunbar, R. (Eds.). (2009). Synergies in Minority Protection. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575372

Hidayah, N. (2014). Reinterpretation of Women’s Economic Rights in Islam. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 14(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v17i1.1245

Hifni, M. (2017). Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Suami Istri dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Bil Dalil, 1(02), 49–80.

Ho, H. M. Y. (2021). Localisation of Malay Muslim Identity in Brunei Darussalam: A Modern Nation’s Cultural and Economic Goals. In Engaging Modern Brunei (pp. 127–143). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4721-2_8

Indrakumari, R., Sriramulu, S., Partheeban, N., & Rajavel, R. (2024). FloodWatch. In Digital Twin Technology and Applications (pp. 374–387). Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003469612-15

Johnson, O. (2024). Race, Affirmative Action, Antidiscrimination, and the Roberts Court. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 713(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251334504

Lazcano, M., & Jaime, A. (2025). Family pluralism and the right to non-discrimination: inter-american standards and jurisprudential evolution in mexico (2020–2024) [Pluralismo familiar y derecho a la no discriminación: estándares interamericanos y evolución jurisprudencial en méxico (202. Revista Juridica, 117–138.

Lin, I.-F., & Brown, S. L. (2021). The Economic Consequences of Gray Divorce for Women and Men. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(10), 2073–2085. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa157

Maleong, L. J. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Malik, J., White, N., McLeod, H. J., & Hakim, C. (2024). The evolving experiences and impacts of divorce for women living in Palestine: a mixed-method narrative analysis. Journal of Gender Studies, 33(8), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2337092

Manan, A. (2005). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. PT. Kencana.

Mansari, M., & Moriyanti, M. (2019). Sensitivitas Hakim Terhadap Perlindungan Nafkah Isteri Pasca Perceraian. Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 5(1), 43–58.

Mickey-Pabello, D., & Guerra, S. (2025). Affirmative Action Bans, Individual Bias, and Systematic Inequality. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322251356292

Nagy, N., & Szappanyos, M. (2024). Chapter 8: The Rights of European Minorities in the Fields of Justice, Public Administration and Public Services—International Developments in 2022. European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online, 21(1), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117_02101009

Nash, C. J. (2009). Patriarchy. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 102–107). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00982-2

Nash, C. J. (2020). Patriarchy. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 43–47). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10206-9

Nasution, K. (2016). Perlindungan Terhadap Anak Dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam Indonesia. Al-’Adalah, 13(1), 1–10.

Nurein, S. A., & Iqbal, H. (2021). Identifying a space for young Black Muslim women in contemporary Britain. Ethnicities, 21(3), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968211001899

Pałach, P. (2024). The Effects of the Termination of Marriage… on the Rights of the Spouses to the Residential Premises in the Housing Cooperative. Selected Issues Regarding the Cooperative Ownership Right to the Premises and the Cooperative Housing Tenancy Right to the Res. Prawo i Wiez, 51(4), 207 – 219. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI51.912

Pelu, I. E. A., Tarantang, J., Fauzi, A., Badarulzaman, M. H., Sururie, R. W., & Anwar, S. (2024). Polygamy Law Reform Through the Development of the Aceh Qanun: A New Approach to Protecting the Rights of Women and Children in Indonesia. El-Mashlahah, 14(1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v14i1.7864

Pratiwi, R. W. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kelalaian Pemenuhan Pembayaran Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Blitar. Negara Dan Keadilan, 9(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukum.v9i1.7491

Rabinská, I. (2022). Institutions Strengthening the Position of the Injured Party of the Offence of Failure to Pay Alimony under Section 196 of the Czech Criminal Code and in Selected European Legal Regulations. International and Comparative Law Review, 22(2), 259 – 277. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2022-0025

Salma, S., Alwi, B. M., Hasan, F., & Karim Hammad, H. A. Al. (2025). The Dilemma of Joint Property (Gono-gini) in Multi-Ethnic Marriage Communities in North Sulawesi. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(1), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.11802

Shah, S. (2018). ‘We are equals’; datum or delusion: perceptions of Muslim women academics in three Malaysian universities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2017.1343126

Sholeh, A., Rachmat Gumelar, D., & Tsamrotul Fuadah, A. (2019). Pendampingan Hak-Hak Perempuan dan Anak Pasca Perceraian. JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset Dan Konsultan Sosial, 1(2), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.51486/jbo.v1i2.19

Sugitanata, A., Hasan, F., Kurniawan, M. R., & Aminah, S. (2024). Pemberdayaan Perempuan melalui Pendidikan Islam Progresif Suud Sarim Karimullah: Analisis Strukturalisme dan Implikasinya. Muadalah, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18592/muadalah.v12i1.12151

Turner, J. J., Higginbotham, B. J., Bradford, K., & Schramm, D. G. (2024). Divorce Education and African American Parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 33(8), 2624–2636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02889-w

van den Braak, S., Choenni, S., & Verwer, S. (2013). Combining and Analyzing Judicial Databases (pp. 191–206). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_10

Varga, E. T. (2024). What is the economically and socially optimised child support?: Introducing a child welfare optimization approach. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 32(1), 131 – 154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00865-1

Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarchy. Canbridge Center.

Williams, S. (2012). Democratic Theory, Feminist Theory, and Constitutionalism. In Feminist Constitutionalism (pp. 393–410). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980442.028

Wranová, S. (2023). Conflict of Preliminary Measures: Domestic Violence and Child Access; [Kolize předběžných opatření: domácí násilí a styk s nezletilým]. Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi, 31(3), 673 – 702. https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2023-3-7

Yasin, Y., Hasan, F., & Amiruddin, F. (2021). Mediation in Marriage Disputes and Divorce (Analytical Study on the Application of Mediation in the Gorontalo Religious Court). Innovatio: Journal for Religious Innovations Studies, 21(1), 24.