Justice for Cut Intan Nabila: Integration of Islamic Law and Psychology in Adjudicating Cases of Violence Against Women

Keadilan untuk Cut Intan Nabila: Integrasi Hukum Islam dan Psikologi dalam Peradilan Kasus Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan

  • Faradila Hasan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
  • Fioreza Ayulis Putri Rajak Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
Keywords: Violence against women, Islamic-Psychological Judicial Framework (IPJF), Islamic law, Trauma psychology, Indonesian criminal justice system

Abstract

This research examines the integration of Islamic law and psychology within the Indonesian criminal justice system to enhance protection for women victims of violence. Utilizing the domestic violence case of social media influencer Cut Intan Nabila as a case study, this research develops the Islamic-Psychological Judicial Framework (IPJF), which combines principles of Islamic law, understanding of trauma psychology, and best practices in the judicial system. Through juridical-normative analysis and an interdisciplinary approach, this study identifies gaps in the existing system and formulates strategies for IPJF implementation. The findings indicate that IPJF has the potential to increase the effectiveness of case handling, reduce revictimization, and enhance victim recovery. The implementation of IPJF is projected to transform legal culture to become more gender-responsive and victim protection-oriented, as well as serve as a potential model for other Muslim-majority countries.

References

Abd Razak, M. A., Zainal Abidin, M. S., & Harun, M. S. (2023). Islamic Psychospiritual Theory According to the Perspective of Maqasid al-Sharia. Isl{=a}miyy{=a}t: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 45(1).

Abdullah, M. (2018). Marriage In Islam and the Problem of Gender Equality: A Philosophical Perspective. Ulumuna, 22(1), 57–76.

Anggraeni, R. D. (2023). Islamic Law and Customary Law in Contemporary Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Tension and Constraints. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 23(1).

Antasari, R. (2021). Islam and Domestic Violence between Husbands and Wives: Indonesian Social and Cultural Perceptions. Islamic Quarterly, 65(3), 303–325.

Ashworth, A. (2019). Victims’ rights, defendants’ rights and criminal procedure. In Integrating a victim perspective within criminal justice (pp. 185–204). Routledge.

Beaman, L. G. (2017). Deep equality in an era of religious diversity. Oxford University Press.

Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1339–1346.

Cholil, M., & Sudirman, S. (2019). Gender Equality In Islamic Family Law: Breaking the Chain of Domestic Violence to Achieve Harmonious Family. Kafaah: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(2), 131–146.

Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25.

Duderija, A. (2020). Contemporary Muslim male reformist thought and gender equality affirmative interpretations of Islam. Feminist Theology, 28(2), 161–181.

Efendi, M. M. (2020). Reinterpretasi Kata Qiwamah dalam Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Nisa’: 34 Perspektif Contextual Approach Abdullah Saeed. KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah): Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin, 10(2), 196–207.

Hakim, C. (2016). Key issues in women’s work: female diversity and the polarisation of women’s employment. Routledge-Cavendish.

Hamida, N. A. (2022). Adat law and legal pluralism in Indonesia: toward a new perspective? Indon. JLS, 3, 1.

Hassan, A., Fatima, S., & Bilal, M. (2022). English-The Issue Of Qawamah In Traditional And Modern Legal Discourse. The Scholar Islamic Academic Research Journal, 8(1), 1–15.

Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., Brewin, C. R., Cloitre, M., Downes, A. J., Jumbe, S., Karatzias, T., Bisson, J. I., & Roberts, N. P. (2017). Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136(3), 313–322.

Katz, S., & Haldar, D. (2015). The pedagogy of trauma-informed lawyering. Clinical L. Rev., 22, 359.

Khasan, M. (2017). Prinsip-prinsip keadilan hukum dalam asas legalitas hukum pidana islam. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 21–36.

Kilmartin, C. (2015). Men’s violence against women: an overview. Religion and Men’s Violence against Women, 15–25.

Komnas Perempuan. (2023). Lembar Fakta Catatan Tahunan Komnas Perempuan Tahun 2023 Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan di Ranah Publik dan Negara: Minimnya Pelindungan dan Pemulihan (Vol. 5). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558907/

Koppa, E. W., & Duffy, L. N. (2020). Gender-Based Violence: A Systematic Literature Review of Causes and Intersections with Tourism. Tourism and Gender-Based Violence: Challenging Inequalities, 14.

Krahé, B. (2016). Violence against women. Aggression and Violence, 251–268.

Kunst, M., Popelier, L., & Varekamp, E. (2015). Victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system and emotional recovery: A systematic and critical review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 336–358.

Lacey, N., & Pickard, H. (2015). To blame or to forgive? Reconciling punishment and forgiveness in criminal justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 35(4), 665–696.

McGarry, R., & Walklate, S. (2015). Victims. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203727379

Moreland, A., & Ressler, K. J. (2021). A perspective for understanding trauma and the criminal juvenile justice system: Using a trauma-informed lens for meaningful and sustained change. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 29(3), 216–224.

Nasrudiansyah, I., & Alijaya, A. (2023). Kajian Yuridis Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga Ditinjau Berdasarkan Hukum Islam. MIM: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 1(1), 39–64.

O’Donohue, W. T. (2019). Reporting sexual assault: Process and barriers victims experience. Handbook of Sexual Assault and Sexual Assault Prevention, 591–608.

Osborn, M., & Rajah, V. (2022). Understanding formal responses to intimate partner violence and women’s resistance processes: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(5), 1405–1419.

Rohmah, E. I., & Ilmiah, Z. (2023). Reinterpretation Of Maqashid Al-Sharia In Indonesian Legal Products. Alfiqh Islamic Law Review Journal, 2(3), 203–2020.

Sahrasad, H. (2019). Culture And Religion: The Movement And Thought Of Islam Nusantara Nowadays, A Socio-Cultural Reflection. El Harakah, 21(1), 1.

Sharma, I. (2015). Violence against women: Where are the solutions? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(2), 131–139.

Sudrajat, T. (2022). The Combination of Normative Juridical Methods and Literature in Educational Administration Research. Proceedings of International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM), 3, 26.

Sumardi, D., Lukito, R., & Ichwan, M. N. (2021). Legal pluralism within the space of Sharia: Interlegality of criminal law traditions in Aceh, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 426–449.

Wallis, J. P., & Mechling, J. (2019). PTSD and Folk Therapy: Everyday Practices of American Masculinity in the Combat Zone. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8_uqDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=haji+transgender&ots=Et8MM-7lrT&sig=cOv1ZuAjdk3jrovXVpitBlRdflE

Wardi, C., A’la, A., Nurhayati, S., & others. (2023). Contextualisation Of Al-Maqasid Al-Kulliyat According To The Objectives Of The Individual, Family, Society And Humanity: An Analysis On Jamaluddin 'Athiyah's Perspectives. Malaysia Journal Syariah & Law, 11(1).

Wulandari, E. P., & Krisnani, H. (2020). Kecenderungan menyalahkan korban (victim-blaming) dalam kekerasan seksual terhadap perempuan sebagai dampak kekeliruan atribusi. Share: Social Work Journal, 10(2), 187–197.

Yehuda, R., Hoge, C. W., McFarlane, A. C., Vermetten, E., Lanius, R. A., Nievergelt, C. M., Hobfoll, S. E., Koenen, K. C., Neylan, T. C., & Hyman, S. E. (2015). Post-traumatic stress disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 1(1), 1–22.

Ziembiński, Z., & Ziembiński, Z. (1976). Methodological Characteristics of Juridical Sciences. Practical Logic, 340–348.

Published
2024-08-18
Section
Articles